During the last week, I’ve gotten a handful of messages inviting me to choose. Facebook is alive with straightforward or coy or awkward suggestions about picking the winners. Saw a few on Twitter today. There are bracket charts for several competitions floating around right now. It’s the season.
March Madness, yes. Basketball? No, something different – writing competitions. Who do I like better, her or him? Next round, her or her? Theoretically, it’s for their books, but it feels more like a popularity contest at times. These are professionals, people I’ve met and shared drinks with in a lot of cases. They’re capable, sometimes even breathtakingly good, writers who have worked hard, polished their words, driven the kinks out of their plots until they were able to give us some pretty wonderful stories.
When I was outside this business, I chose to think that writing awards were given for excellence in the craft, period. I was pleased when a book I particularly liked won, and intrigued when one I’d never heard of was crowned. But, as always happens, you see a lot of what goes on behind the scenes the closer in you get. That’s the world.
I’m not griping – I’m happy to see anyone in the tribe get noticed. And, as any agent or editor will tell you, it’s a big boost to selling books. But I don’t like the bracket approach because, as in basketball, it demands a loser for every winner, and none of these authors is that. So I’m passing on the brackets game and will continue to pile up TBR books people are talking about, whether they’re written by charming or curmudgeonly authors. The way brackets work, all but a couple will be “losers.” Not my game.
NOTE: Next Friday, I’ll be at Left Coast Crime, the big authors and fans event that’s happening in Santa Fe this year. I’m pleased to be on a panel on Thursday afternoon talking about reasons to set crime fiction in that beautiful city (where part of ABSTRACT was set). I’ll take a break from the blog, but write about LCC when I return.

